Argumentation-based Negotiation in t-DeLP-POP
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this contribution, we propose to model argumentation-based negotiation in terms of t-DeLP-POP, a partial order planning system that incorporates temporal defeasible logic. This logic combines temporal facts and durative rules into temporal arguments. We propose a dialogue protocol for the negotiation of plans in this planning system that models a variety of scenarios for argumentative negotiation of complex services. Then we consider case studies in the literature can be naturally modeled by dialogues in this logic-based planning framework.
منابع مشابه
Multiagent argumentation for cooperative planning in DeLP-POP
This contribution proposes a model for argumentation-based multi-agent planning, with a focus on cooperative scenarios. It consists in a multi-agent extension of DeLP-POP, partial order planning on top of argumentation-based defeasible logic programming. In DeLP-POP, actions and arguments (combinations of rules and facts) may be used to enforce some goal, if their conditions (are known to) appl...
متن کاملA Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation with Vague Knowledge
Defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning from incomplete and potentially inconsistent knowledge. Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) is a defeasible argumentation formalism based on an extension of logic programming. Although DeLP has been successfully integrated in a number of different real-world applications, D...
متن کاملExtending a Temporal Defeasible Argumentation Framework with Possibilistic Weights
Recently, a temporal extension of the argumentation defeasible reasoning system DeLP has been proposed. This system, called t-DeLP, allows to reason defeasibly about changes and persistence over time but does not offer the possibility of ranking defeasible rules according to criteria of preference or certainty (in the sense of belief). In this contribution we extend t-DeLP by allowing to attach...
متن کاملWLP 2014 28 th Workshop on ( Constraint ) Logic Programming
A novel argumentation semantics of defeasible logic programs (DeLP) is presented. Our goal is to build a semantics, which respects existing semantics and intuitions of “classical” logic programming. Generalized logic programs (GLP) are selected as an appropriate formalism for studying both undermining and rebutting. Our argumentation semantics is based on a notion of conflict resolution strateg...
متن کاملEmbedding Defeasible Logic Programs into Generalized Logic Programs
A novel argumentation semantics of defeasible logic programs (DeLP) is presented. Our goal is to build a semantics, which respects existing semantics and intuitions of “classical” logic programming. Generalized logic programs (GLP) are selected as an appropriate formalism for studying both undermining and rebutting. Our argumentation semantics is based on a notion of conflict resolution strateg...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011